Could lab-grown meat soon be the solution to the world's food crisis?
Adeline Tan finds out.
Figure 1: Can a hamburger be made in a laboratory?
H
umans rely on animals for meat and dairy products, which
put an enormous strain on the planet’s over-stretched
resources. Given that 70 percent of agricultural land is
already used for meat production, this could precipitate
a food crisis of unimaginable proportions. And that’s not even
considering the looming environmental impact as more animals and
less rainforest accelerate climate change.
With world population projected to reach 9 billion by 2050, the Food
and Agriculture Organization (FAO) estimates that annual global
meat production will need to double to 463 million tones to meet
future demand. Globally, as developing countries and their people
get wealthier, we see a corresponding increase in the amount of
meat in their diet.
Global data analysis shows that most people are not keen on
a substantial reduction of meat in their diet, so an alternative
sustainable way of producing meat is required. A report by Global
Industry Analysts released in September 2012 forecasts world meat
consumption to cross 296 million tons by 2018, driven by increasing
consumption in emerging markets such as Asia-Pacifi c, and Latin
America.
Rising food prices, the growing population and environmental
concerns are just a few issues that governments face in addition to
how we will feed ourselves in the future. Meat will become more of a
luxury item – the Netherlands, like many other countries are looking
for new ways to fi ll the meat gap.
Investing in R&D
Because of changing consumer expectations, food manufacturers
know that they have to constantly innovate to remain competitive.
This is the reason why the industry keeps investing heavily in research
and development to stay ahead of the game. New products are
entering the market, while existing products are being reformulated
and commercialized to meet scientifi cally-based recommendations
and higher consumer demand for healthier products that also meet
food safety, environmental and ethical standards.
The Netherlands has a lot to offer in this challenging research area of
nutrition and sustainable living. The country is a hotbed of R&D in the
area of food technology, thanks to its notable research institutes and
strong links between the academia and industry that come together to
facilitate an open exchange of vital information, new food technology
and innovative solutions. Holland Food Valley, for example, is home
to a cluster of agri-food companies and expert institutes where both multinationals and SMEs get to work with top-class research institutes on the world’s
most advanced research into new, healthy products and agro-business concepts. Eight of
the 25 largest Dutch companies are food corporations and many multinationals have an
affi liation to the Netherlands. Prominent companies like Danone, Kraft, Coca Cola, Nestle,
Asahi Breweries, Ajinomoto Co and Meiji Holdings make up a signifi cant portion of that
number.
Figure 2: Growing outside the animal and without the benefi ts of years of grazing, the
texture of lab-grown meat is not nature-identical and would need to be subjected to
established food technology methods to enhance taste and texture.
The Dutch food sector is constantly pushing the envelope to come up with innovative
solutions. In fact, the Netherlands may already have some of the answers to the world’s
future food challenges. One of these is the development of cultured meat that may pave
the way towards solving the global food crisis facing a rapidly-growing population, with
countries in expanding markets such as India and China, with limited land resources,
nurturing an increasing taste for meat.
From lab to plate
New research could see meat grown in the laboratory being made into an edible burger
by the end of this year. At fi rst glance, a sliver of muscle tissue sitting in a little petri dish
and surrounded by a liquid growth medium may not look as appetizing as a juicy steak;
but soon it will form a component of an edible burger.
The burger will be the culmination of a research project that began in 2004 to create edible
meat from stem cells, otherwise known as in-vitro meat, led by Mark Post, Professor of
Vascular Physiology and Tissue Engineering at Maastricht University in the Netherlands.
So how is a hamburger made in a laboratory?
“There are several steps and the procedure starts when muscle stem cells are taken from
animals in a biopsy,” Prof. Post says.
To create these solid muscle fi bres, the cultivated muscle cells are affi xed to a string of
sugar molecules and left to grow between two anchor points. This process occurs largely
spontaneously.
The cells are left to multiply and then develop into muscle cells in a nutritional substance
– a “growth medium” – for example algae extract. The cultivated muscle cells bulk up
into solid muscle fi bres and bundles. As the muscle cells grow in size, the tissue is
continuously supplied with nutrients. For the small, newly formed muscle strands, this is
achieved by regularly changing the growth medium.
The natural consistency of meat must then be recreated by achieving the correct
composition of protein and fat tissue. The edible muscle tissue can be ground to create
minced meat and, ultimately, a hamburger.
According to Prof. Post, cultured meat, also known as in vitro meat or lab-grown meat,
draws on the science of stem cell technology used in medicine. Stem cells are extracted
from a pig and converted to pig muscle cells. These muscle cells are then cultured on a
scaffold with nutrients and essential vitamins and grown to desired quantities.
During the growth process, the muscle cells are also “exercised” using
either mechanical stretchers or electric stimulation. The scaffold and
the exercise provide the muscle cells with ideal structure, texture
and strength, while the growth supplements bestow the cells with
optimal nutrition. Ultimately, these cells can be shaped and seasoned
into sausages, hamburgers, steaks or mince. All this would happen
without any genetic manipulation.
Unlike genetically modifi ed food, the DNA in cultured meat would
remain untouched and not suffer the genetic instabilities that affect
cloned animals. The technology being developed in the lab would
imitate nature and aims to replicate how meat normally develops
without including the rest of the body.
Taste and texture
Growing outside the animal and without the benefi t of years of
grazing, the texture is not nature-identical and would need to be
subjected to established food technology methods to enhance taste
and texture. Conventionally, taste is infl uenced by many factors such
as the source of muscle cell, the fat content and the texture. Cultured
meat's controlled production conditions allow for the addition,
removal or changing of any feature of the meat product based on
consumer preferences. In theory, the cultured meat technology can
supply the entire world's meat demands for a year, using only one or
few cells and to specifi c taste requirements.
Figure 3: To create solid muscle fi bres, the cultivated muscle cells
are affi xed to a string of sugar molecules and left to grow between
two anchor points.
To further improve meat-like qualities, researchers are working on
cultivating fat tissue and enhancing the expression of the oxygenbinding
muscle protein myoglobin.
Healthier option?
While plant sources of protein and meat replacements are more
commonly available and better for our health, nutritionists also
advocate the value of eating some meat. Meat is an important source
of a number of nutrients in our diet, including high quality protein,
iron, zinc, selenium, vitamin D and some B vitamins.
Cultured meat is also believed to be healthier than conventional meat.
The quantity and quality of fat can be controlled, so it is possible to
produce cultured meat without any fat or with healthy fats.
For food manufacturers faced with growing food prices and the
increasing global appetite for animal protein, meat grown in vitro
could be fi ne-tuned to produce specifi c dietary benefi ts, including
culturing the meat to be high in omega-3 fatty acids or fi ber.
Other benefi ts could include greatly reducing the incidence of
foodborne pathogens, reducing animal to human transmission of
emerging infectious diseases, and even reducing chronic disease
associated with meat consumption. Manufacturers would be able to
offer meats that are not only healthier, but also products that are
acceptable to meat eaters and vegetarians alike in the future.
Environmentally friendly
Research from the University of Oxford and the University of
Amsterdam published last year, estimated that lab-grown meat
produces 78-96 percent lower greenhouse gas emissions than
conventionally produced meat within the EU. It also had a 99 percent
lower land use and an 82-96 percent lower water use.
The environmental benefi ts of cultured meat are even greater when
the costs of land use are taken into account. Strategies for carbon
sequestration could be used on the land freed from meat agriculture
and would include growing new forests. There would also be an
increase in biodiversity as more land could be used for wildlife
conservation.
The researchers based their calculations on a process, using
Cyanobacteria hydrolysate as a nutrient and energy source for
growing muscle cells, that is being developed by co-author Dr. Joost
Teixeira de Mattos at the University of Amsterdam. While tissueengineering
technology is currently confi ned to the laboratory,
the researchers estimated what the various costs would be for
producing 1000 kg of cultured meat using a scaled-up version of the
technology compared to the costs associated with livestock reared
conventionally.
Figure 4: Research from the University of Oxford and the University
of Amsterdam note that lab-grown meat produces an estimated
78-96% lower greenhouse gas emissions than conventionally
produced meat in the within the EU.
Cultured meat offers the potential of a more effi cient and
environmentally-friendly way of putting meat on the table.
A promising future
How long before the meat is available in supermarkets depends on
the investment in research and development. Even with all these
apparent advantages, more work needs to be done to develop the
cultured meat technology. The most optimistic estimates are that the
fi rst commercial product could be available in about fi ve years. The
fi rst product will be minced beef or a sausage; steaks may take a
little longer.
In 2008, PETA offered a $1 million prize to the fi rst laboratory
to produce the fi rst in vitro chicken meat and make the product
commercially viable by 30 June 2012. The product must exhibit a
taste and texture that is indistinguishable from real chicken fl esh to
non-meat eaters and meat eaters. PETA has extended the contest
deadline to 30 June 2013 as there had been no news yet of an in vitro
chicken nugget on the horizon.
Source by
Asia Food Journal